WOLA: Advocacy for Human Rights in the Americas



Central America’s Northern Triangle region is struggling with violence, corruption and impunity.

Scroll for the key findings or to find links to download the full reports under each area of progress.

Evaluating progress in Central America

As Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras struggle with high levels of violence and insecurity, systemic corruption, and widespread impunity, it’s critical that we find ways to assess how the policies and strategies being implemented in the region are contributing to the strengthening of the rule of law, improving transparency and accountability, and to reducing violence and insecurity. Using a comprehensive series of indicators, the Central American Monitor aims to measure progress and identify trends over time in eight key areas directly relevant to rule of law and security, thus providing critical information that can inform policies and strategic investments in the region.
The Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), the Myrna Mack Foundation (FMM) of Guatemala, the University Institute for Public Opinion (Iudop) of the José Simeón Cañas Central American University (UCA) of El Salvador, the University Institute on Democracy, Peace and Security (IUDPAS) of the National Autonomous University of Honduras (UNAH) have developed a series of qualitative and quantitative indicators to evaluate progress in Central America in eight key areas.
Combatting Corruption
Areas of progress

Levels of Public Trust

Corruption scandals significantly affect how much citizens say they trust democracy, the government, and political parties. The annual Corruption Perceptions Index published by Transparency International offers a snapshot of citizen perceptions of corruption in Honduras. The Transparency International score ranges from 0 (least transparent) to 100 (most transparent), and is based in part on surveys with experts and companies regarding how corruption is perceived in the public sector. As the table shows, from 2015 to 2017, the perception index dropped one point annually, reflecting a high perception of corruption. By 2017, Honduras was among the 124 countries that scored below 50, and ranked as third most corrupt among Central American countries, above Nicaragua and Guatemala.
Combatting Corruption
Areas of progress

Scope and Implementation of Legislation to Combat Corruption

In 2014, the National Congress began developing a new Criminal Code to replace the 1983 version, which is considered to be out of date. Approved by legislators in early 2018, the new code is set to become effective in 2020. The new law reduces penalties for a number of corruption-related offenses, including embezzlement, influence peddling, obstruction of justice, and bribery. The law is also retroactive and would benefit those already convicted or facing prosecution.  Moreover, the new code does not regulate the practice of nepotism or illicit financing, although it does sanction the use of privileged information for the first time.
Combatting Corruption
Areas of progress

Advancements in Criminal Investigations

Over a four-year period (2014-2017), the Public Prosecutor’s Office received 7,433 complaints, a 43 percent increase in complaints regarding possible cases of corruption. The data provided by the Public Prosecutor’s Office shows that an estimated 12 percent of complaints received between 2014 and 2017 were investigated. In about 223 of these cases, the Public Prosecutor’s filed charges (90 cases in 2016; 70 in 2015; and 63 in 2014). Of these, 69 went to the trial stage. The table below shows a more detailed breakdown. From 2014 to 2017, the Judiciary accepted 534 cases related to possible corruption offenses. Of these, 23.7 percent resulted in convictions.    
Combatting Corruption
Areas of progress

Functioning of Oversight Bodies

The government’s main corruption oversight body is the Superior Court of Accounts. Created in 2002, its function is to control the use of public funds, assets and resources. This body includes a department tasked with monitoring compliance with public asset laws and reviewing the records of public officials to determine wrong-doing. However, the institution is in a vulnerable situation, as large corruption scandals were made public between 2014 and 2017. As of 2017, there were about 25 investigations handled by the Court on the verge of shutting down, as they’d been opened a decade ago and were nearing the statute of limitations deadline.   Moreover, in 2018, the Congress amended the Budget Law making the TSC the only institution capable of auditing public funds. The law also prohibits the Public Prosecutor from investigating cases of corruption within the legislative branch until after the TSC completes an audit, which normally take up to three years.  Another key corruption oversight body in Honduras is the National Anti-Corruption Council (CNA by its Spanish acronym), a civil society group established by legislative decree in 2005. It cannot initiate criminal proceedings, but it can share research findings with the Attorney General’s Office and attend trials. Of the 88 investigations presented by the CNA since its creation, only 15 have resulted in prosecutions. As the accompanying table shows, the CNA has recommended that prosecutions be opened into corruption cases involving the embezzlement of hundreds of millions of lempiras. 

The Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), the Myrna Mack Foundation (FMM) of Guatemala, the University Institute for Public Opinion (Iudop) of the José Simeón Cañas Central American University (UCA) of El Salvador, the University Institute on Democracy, Peace and Security (IUDPAS) of the National Autonomous University of Honduras (UNAH) have developed a series of indicators to assess the progress in Central America in eight key areas. That progress will reflect both the commitment of Central American governments and the effectiveness of international assistance. The indicators include a combination of quantitative data and qualitative analysis in order to gain a more in-depth understanding of the changes taking place in each country. Data sources include official documents and statistics, surveys, interviews, and reviews of existing laws and regulations that will be systematically compiled.

WOLA, the Myrna Mack Foundation, Iudop, and IUDPAS developed these indicators in a months-long process that included review of international standards, consultation with experts, and consensus among all partners about the key issues to address.
Our goal is to provide an instrument that can help identify the areas of progress and opportunities for improvement shortfalls for of the policies and strategies being implemented on the ground in a form that is useful for policymakers, donors, academics, and the public. At the same time, we hope to provide analysis that can contribute to the evaluation of trends over time both within and between the countries of the Northern Triangle.

Strengthening the Capacity and Independence of Justice Systems

Capacity of the Justice System: Number of criminal justice officials, geographical coverage, workload, effectiveness, and public trust.

Internal Independence: Existence and implementation of a public, merit-based selection process free from external influence, a results-based evaluation system, and an effective disciplinary system.

External Independence: Size of budget allocated for the judicial sector and implementation of national and international protection measures for justice officials.

Cooperation with Anti-Impunity Commissions

Political Will and Level of Collaboration: Commitment of the state to collaborate and enable the work of the CICIG in Guatemala and the MACCIH in Honduras, demonstrated by the progress of emblematic cases, the approval of legislative reforms, and support for domestic counterparts working with these commissions.

Combating Corruption

Level of Public Trust: Degree of public trust in state institutions involved in efforts to prevent, identify, investigate, and punish corruption.

Scope and Implementation of Legislation to Combat Corruption: Classification of new crimes in criminal codes and reforms of existing anti-corruption laws to adhere to international standards.

Advancements in Criminal Investigations: Number of corruption cases filed, prosecuted, and resolved, as well as the progress made in emblematic cases.

Functioning of Oversight Bodies: Existence and capacity of external oversight bodies or agencies to combat corruption.

Tackling Violence and Organized Crime

Capacity Building: Existence and functioning of specialized anti-organized crime units, application of scientific and technical investigative methods, and functioning of judges or tribunals dedicated to the prosecution of organized crime

Advances in Criminal Investigations: The number of organized crime-related cases filed, prosecuted, and resolved, as well as the progress made in emblematic cases.

Crime Reduction: Convictions for homicides, extortion, and against criminal networks, as well as a reduction in serious and violent crimes.

Strengthening Civilian Police Forces

Functioning of Police Career Systems: Existence and effectiveness of police recruitment and promotion mechanisms, training processes, and disciplinary systems, as well as the structure of police bodies.

Allocation and Use of Budgetary Resources: Allocation and effective use of public funds and percentage designated for the wellbeing of members of the civilian police forces.

Community Relations: Public trust in the police, police-community relations, and relations with indigenous authorities.

Limiting the Role of the Armed Forces in Public Security Activities

Development and Implementation of a Concrete Plan: The design and implementation of a publicly accessible and verifiable plan with goals, timelines, activities, and clearly established indicators; repeal of legal norms authorizing participation of armed forces in public security, and access to information regarding payroll and assigned resources.

Conduct of Military Forces: Complaints, accusations, and sentences regarding human rights violations perpetrated by members of the armed forces and the level of public trust in the armed forces.

Protecting Human Rights

Investigation and Conviction of Human Rights Violations: Existence and functioning of specialized investigative units, number of complaints, prosecutions, and convictions, handling of emblematic cases, and degree of security forces’ collaboration with investigations.

Protection Mechanisms: Structure and functioning of domestic protection mechanisms and implementation of international protection measures for human rights defenders who have been victims of attacks or threats.

Hate Speech: Analysis of attacks and smear or defamation campaigns against human rights defenders.

Improving Transparency

Scope and Implementation of the ‘Law of Access to Public Information’: Type of information categorized as restricted or of limited access, period of classification, availability and quality of statistics related to security and justice, information requests granted and denied, and related fees.

Budget and Spending Transparency: Access to public information on budget allocations and spending on security, justice, and defense.

Disclosure of Public Officials’ Statement of Assets: Level of official compliance with disclosure norms, and the degree to which such statements are made available to the public.


The Central America Monitor is based on the premise that accurate, objective, and complete data and information are necessary to reduce the high levels of violence and insecurity, and establish rule of law and governance in a democratic state. This will allow efforts to move beyond abstract discussions of reform to specific measures of change.

The Monitor is based on a series of more than 100 quantitative and qualitative indicators that allow a more profound level of analysis of the successes or setbacks made in eight key areas in each of the three countries. More than a comprehensive list, the indicators seek to identify a way to examine and assess the level of progress of the three countries in strengthening the rule of law and democratic institutions. The indicators seek to identify the main challenges in each of the selected areas and examine how institutions are (or are not) being strengthened over time. The Monitor uses information from different sources, including official documents and statistics, surveys, interviews, information from emblematic cases, and analysis of existing laws and regulations.

The indicators were developed over several months in a process that included an extensive review of international standards and consultation with experts. The eight areas analyzed by the Monitor include:

  • 1. Strengthening the Capacity and Independence of Justice Systems
  • 2. Cooperation with Anti-Impunity Commissions
  • 3. Combating Corruption
  • 4. Tackling Violence and Organized Crime
  • 5. Strengthening Civilian Police Forces
  • 6. Limiting the Role of the Armed Forces in Public Security Activities
  • 7. Protecting Human Rights
  • 8. Improving Transparency