Due to end-of-year staff vacation time, WOLA will not publish Border Updates for the next two weeks. Updates will resume on January 10, 2025.
With this series of weekly updates, WOLA seeks to cover the most important developments at the U.S.-Mexico border. See past weekly updates here.
Support ad-free, paywall-free Weekly Border Updates. Your donation to WOLA is crucial to sustain this effort. Please contribute now and support our work.
November data showed migration levels at the border continuing to decline following Donald Trump’s election, to such an extent that, for the first time, port-of-entry arrivals exceeded Border Patrol apprehensions. Still, some reports from Texas point to an increase in mid-December as some people try to reach U.S. soil before Inauguration Day. Rumors sent some migrants to attempt to turn themselves in at a border wall gate in El Paso, where state forces repelled them violently. Caravans continue to form in southern Mexico, but none remain intact beyond Mexico’s southernmost states.
As Trump administration officials ramp up plans to deport undocumented migrants on a massive scale likely requiring the use of military aircraft, concern is sweeping throughout communities where many families are “blended”: citizens living with non-citizens. Fear is spreading in south Texas, while council members and law enforcement in San Diego disagree on cooperation.
Conservative media and Donald Trump complained bitterly about the Biden administration’s auctioning off of border wall parts left over when construction halted after Joe Biden’s January 2021 inauguration. In fact, the selloff was mandated by the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act.
November data
Border Patrol apprehended migrants 46,612 times at the U.S.-Mexico border in November, according to data that Customs and Border Protection (CBP) published on December 19. That is the smallest monthly apprehensions number since July 2020, a few months into the pandemic during Donald Trump’s first presidency.
For the first time probably ever, the number of people who came to the border’s ports of entry, mostly with CBP One appointments (47,578, green in the chart below) exceeded Border Patrol apprehensions. If, as expected, Donald Trump does away with the CBP One appointment program for asylum seekers after his January 20 inauguration, we can expect Border Patrol apprehensions (blue in the chart) to revert to being a multiple of port-of-entry encounters again.
Combining Border Patrol apprehensions and ports of entry, 94,190 people ended up in CBP custody in November 2024, the fewest since January 2021. This total is 61 percent fewer than in November 2023, which was one of the border’s busiest months ever.
Of nationalities CBP reported with over 100 migrants in a month, all declined from November to November. The steepest drops were in encounters with citizens of Nicaragua (-87%), Romania (-83%), Peru (-83%), China (-81%), and Ecuador (-80%). The nationalities that declined the least from November to November were Cuba (-43%), Turkey (-48%), Mexico (-52%), Venezuela (-54%), and Haiti (-54%).
Even amid continued declines through November, modest signs point to a possible increase, over the past week or two, ahead of Donald Trump’s January 20 inauguration.
The chief of Border Patrol’s Rio Grande Valley Sector in south Texas, who usually posts an informal tweet about the previous weekend’s security data, reported 1,276 migrant apprehensions over the December 14-15 weekend. That is far more than the 400 to 600 that the sector had been reporting for months, and the most for any weekend in 2024, tweeted Aaron Reichlin-Melnick of the American Immigration Council, who also noted increases in mid-Texas’s Del Rio Sector. It is the first quantitative indicator of an increase in migration since the U.S. election, which raised expectations—so far unmet—that many migrants might rush to enter the United States before Election Day.
Along the Rio Grande in El Paso, dozens of migrants arrived on December 18 across the narrow river from a gate in the border wall where, before a June Biden administration rule put asylum out of reach for unauthorized border crossers, many asylum seekers would regularly come to turn themselves in to Border Patrol agents. They may have been responding to false rumors— addressed on the Border Patrol El Paso Sector Twitter account—that U.S. authorities were commemorating International Migrants’ Day (December 18) by allowing asylum seekers to cross and turn themselves in without first making port-of-entry appointments using the CBP One app.
As is now their custom, even when there is no apparent self-defense justification, Texas National Guard troops fired pepper-ball projectiles at some of the migrants. “A girl was hit in the face, and a man was hit in the chest; we had to run him out, fainting and unresponsive, and the ambulance had to take him away,” a Venezuelan migrant told EFE.
The Mexican daily Milenio charted the paths of six migrant “caravans” in recent months that were all dispersed by Mexican authorities long before they got as far as Mexico City. Migration and security agents prevent motorists from driving “caravan” participants. While all six groups managed to walk out of Chiapas, Mexico’s southernmost state, authorities stopped them elsewhere in southern Mexico: five in Oaxaca and one in Veracruz. Many families are finding themselves stranded in Oaxaca, the daily reported separately.
La Jornada reported about an attempted caravan of about 1,500 people departing Tapachula on December 15. Milenio covered another similarly sized group departing Tapachula on December 18.
“No major caravans have reached the United States in nearly six years,” the Washington Post recalled, in a piece explaining methods Mexico’s government employs to diffuse or dismantle large groups of migrants traveling through its territory. “But while caravans have become a ho-hum issue in Mexico, they continue to alarm American politicians—and one in particular.”
Reporting from Mexico’s southern border-zone city of Tapachula, Chiapas and its environs for TruthDig, Madeleine Wattenbarger documented the brazenly open nature with which organized criminals operate as they massively kidnap migrants for ransom. “Rather than deterring organized crime, the military’s presence has coincided with an increase in migrant kidnappings.”
Reuters published a demographic overview of the undocumented migrant population vulnerable to “mass deportation” from the United States, which it estimated as ranging from 11 million to 14.5 million people.” The latter estimate comes from the advocacy group FWD.us, which reported that “Of those, 10.1 million live with a U.S. citizen or permanent resident, what’s known as a ‘mixed-status household.’”
Tom Homan, the former Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) official who will serve as White House “Border Czar” after Donald Trump takes office, told the Washington Examiner that ICE will need additional military aircraft, beyond its fleet of about 13 private contractor planes, to send migrants out of the United States. While the next administration’s “mass deportation” campaign will first target migrants with criminal records, Homan added, it will be likely to carry out many “collateral arrests” of others accused of no offenses except unlawful entry.
Despite Homan’s pledges to ramp up deportations on day one of the Trump administration, “mass deportation plans rely on others’ cooperation. And the Constitution provides guidance and protections to meet this moment,” recalled Josh Rosenthal and Shayak Sarkar of the University of California at Davis, in a column at Newsweek.
CBS News and the Guardian profiled Federico Arellano, a U.S. citizen living in Texas, whose undocumented wife and four children—three of them U.S. citizens—got deported by ICE after she reported for an appointment with the agency. The attorney representing the family “said he has not seen an instance like this one that involves a family.”
The New York Times reported on undocumented migrants living near the border where Border Patrol operates, many of whom live with U.S. citizen family members, who “fear that they will be easy targets.” An organizer for La Unión del Pueblo Entero, a migrants’ rights defense group in south Texas that estimates 75,000 children in the Rio Grande Valley region live in “blended families,” warned a gathering “to have a plan in place in case they found themselves in an immigration jail, including securing power of attorney to give custody of their children to a legal resident so that their children would not end up in foster care.”
In San Diego, county officials plan to oppose mass deportation operations, but the Sheriff’s office, which is independent, wants to cooperate with them, the Los Angeles Times reported.
“Hondurans, Guatemalans, Salvadorans should be very, very nervous because (Trump officials) are going to push the boundaries of the law,” former Biden-era ICE official Jason Houser told the Associated Press, in a report about the likely massive economic and social impact that mass deportations may have on Central American nations.
Faced with mass deportation, Zachary Mueller of immigrant rights group America’s Voice told the Border Chronicle that advocates’ response must go beyond organizing just around specific issues like immigration policy to encompass “widespread antiauthoritarian coalitions.” The group’s former director, Frank Sharry, co-authored an article in the Atlantic criticizing some migrants’ rights activists, including “self-described ‘abolitionists,’” for abandoning pragmatism in the fight for immigration reform.
A New York Times feature told the story of Jaime Cachua, an undocumented immigrant in Rome, Georgia who may face deportation although he has lived in the United States since his infancy. Many of Cachua’s relatives and colleagues, in a conservative area represented by exuberantly pro-Trump Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia), voted in November for a candidate whose policies may deport him.
The fact-checking site Snopes addressed outrage in conservative media and comments by President-Elect Trump about reports that the outgoing Biden administration is auctioning off bollards and other border wall parts left over when, in January 2021, Joe Biden ordered a halt to construction begun during Trump’s first term. The 2024 National Defense Authorization Act included a provision requiring the Defense Department, which was charged with much wall-building, “to use, transfer, or donate” all “excess construction materials on the southwest border.” The Department had sold the materials to an auction platform in June 2024, months before Trump’s election.
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas), a border and military policy hardliner, sent a letter to Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin demanding that the Department keep all records related to the sale of border wall materials.
Texas’s lieutenant governor, Dan Patrick (R), said that the state decided not to purchase any of the wall materials because they were “mostly junk, with most panels covered in concrete and rust.”
In other “border barrier” news, the New York Times reported that in late 2022, the Biden administration seriously considered installing a “wall of buoys” to block migrants from crossing the Rio Grande. In mid-2023, when Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R), a sharp critic of the administration’s border policies, installed a similar floating barrier in Eagle Pass, the administration challenged it in federal court.