With this series of weekly updates, WOLA seeks to cover the most important developments at the U.S.-Mexico border. See past weekly updates here.
Due to an extended period of staff travel and commitments, we will produce Weekly Border Updates irregularly for the next two and a half months. We will resume a regular weekly schedule on July 26.
Support ad-free, paywall-free Weekly Border Updates. Your donation to WOLA is crucial to sustain this effort. Please contribute now and support our work.
For the second time this year, the U.S. Senate’s Democratic majority sought to bring to a vote a package of border legislation that would, among other provisions, implement Title 42-style suspensions of the right to seek asylum at the border when the number of migrants at the border exceeds certain thresholds. The “Border Act” failed by a 43-50 vote in the face of opposition from some Democrats uncomfortable with the asylum suspension, and nearly all Republicans, who argued that it was not aggressive enough. Media are reporting that the Biden administration plans to issue an executive order in June to enable a similar asylum “shutdown” mechanism at the border.
Although May is normally a peak month for migration, the daily average of Border Patrol migrant apprehensions at the U.S.-Mexico border had dropped to 3,700 so far in May, one of the lowest points of the entire Biden administration. Weekly data indicate that even border sectors that had seen migration increases in the first months of the year, like Tucson, Arizona and San Diego, California, are now experiencing reductions.
Migrants allege that Texas National Guard personnel beat a Honduran migrant so badly that he later died on the Rio Grande riverbank in Ciudad Juárez. Arizona, not Texas, has seen the sharpest migration declines in 2024 despite Gov. Abbott’s claims that his policies have shifted migrants westward. Those policies,some of which Pope Francis called “madness,” have included striking levels of racial profiling, according to an ACLU Texas report. State authorities’ razor wire in Eagle Pass has caused “an unusually high number” of hospitalizations in Eagle Pass, “including young children,” USA Today reported.
On May 23 the Democratic-majority Senate held a “test vote” on the Border Act, a series of border security and migration measures that resulted from bipartisan negotiations between November and February. The bill needed 60 votes to proceed to open debate and an eventual vote; it failed by a 43-50 margin, with all but 1 Republican voting “no,” along with 6 Democrats (or Democratic-caucusing independents).
The most controversial of the Border Act’s provisions was a measure that would cut off protection-seeking migrants’ access to asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border, Title 42-style, when daily migrant encounters exceed an average of 4,000 (discretionary asylum shutdown) or 5,000 (mandatory asylum shutdown).
The Border Act was identical to legislation that failed to clear a procedural vote in the Senate on February 7, when—in response to Republican demands—it was attached to Ukraine and Israel aid (which ultimately passed, separately, in April). At the time, nearly all Republicans, led by Donald Trump, opposed it, arguing that it was not aggressive enough against migration at the border. They are also unwilling to hand Biden a legislative border-migration win in an election year.
Voted contrary to party/caucus majority (7):
Democrats (voted “Nay”) (4): – Cory Booker (NJ) Democrat-caucusing Independents (voted “Nay”) (2): – Bernie Sanders (VT) Republicans (voted “Yea”) (1): – Lisa Murkowski (AK) |
From “Yea” in February to “Nay” in May (6):
Democrats (2): – Cory Booker (NJ) Democrat-caucusing Independents (1): – Kyrsten Sinema (AZ) Republicans (3): |
From “Nay” in February to “Yea” in May (1):
Democrats (1): – Chuck Schumer (NY) – he had to vote “Nay” in February for procedural reasons |
From “Yea” in February to “Not Voting” in May (1):
Democrats (1): – Joe Manchin (WV) |
From “Nay” in February to “Not Voting” in May (6):
Democrats (2): – Bob Menendez (NJ) Republicans (2): |
From “Not Voting” in February to “Nay” in May (1):
Republicans (1): – Cynthia Lummis (WY) |
Republican opposition was even greater this time: Alaska moderate Lisa Murkowski was the only GOP senator to vote for it. Fewer Democrats voted for the bill on May 23 than in February, since Ukraine aid was no longer at stake. Two Democrats changed their votes from “yea” to “nay,” as did Democratic-caucusing independent Kyrsten Sinema (Arizona), who helped draft the original February compromise.
The Biden administration and Senate Democratic leaders view this defeat as good 2024 electoral strategy: they believe that it undermines Republican arguments that Democrats are insufficiently aggressive about border security, and that it reveals Republicans to be uncooperative.
The White House issued a statement of “strong support” for the bill, and President Joe Biden called Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) to urge them to support the bill.
Even in defeat, the result was that for the second time in four months, most Senate Democrats went on the record as supporting a historic rollback of threatened people’s right to seek asylum on U.S. soil: a right that emerged in the years after World War II and was cemented into U.S. law in 1980.
Adding to a Politico report from last Friday, NBC News reported on May 23 that, faced with an inability to pass legislation to enable an asylum “shutdown,” the Biden administration plans to introduce an executive order in June with provisions similar to those foreseen in the “Border Act.”
The report notes that this legally dubious measure would require much cooperation from Mexico’s government, which would have to accept a large number of non-Mexican migrants deported back across the border after being refused asylum. (That many deportees would greatly exceed ICE’s capacity to deport people back to their often distant countries by air.) Administration officials are “in talks with Mexican leaders to get their crucial buy-in before proceeding” with the executive order, NBC noted.
Border Patrol recorded about 3,000 migrant apprehensions on May 20, and an average of 3,700 per day during the first 21 days of May, according to data obtained by CBS News.
That is a more than 50 percent drop from migration levels during the record-setting month of December 2023. And the 3,700 per day average sets May 2024 on pace to be the third-lightest month for migration at the border, out of the Biden administration’s 40 full months in office.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas told reporters that “the drop stems from several factors, including the administration’s efforts to expand legal migration channels and increase deportations of those who enter illegally, as well as more immigration enforcement by Mexico.” This appears to acknowledge that Mexico’s government is accepting a larger number of deportations of Cuban, Haitian, Nicaraguan, and Venezuelan citizens into its territory, as it agreed to do under the Biden administration’s post-Title 42 “asylum ban” rule. Hard numbers for non-Mexican deportations into Mexico have been difficult to obtain.
Of the nine sectors into which Border Patrol divides the U.S.-Mexico border, the two that have seen the most migration since January are Tucson, Arizona and San Diego, California. Both sectors have seen two weeks of declining migrant encounters, according to Twitter posts from their chiefs.
The San Diego Sector chief reported that agents there apprehended 6,157 migrants during the week of May 15-21. That represents a 39 percent drop in migration over the past 3 weeks in San Diego, which led all 9 U.S.-Mexico border sectors in apprehensions in April. It is possible that San Diego may have dropped from the number-one spot among border sectors; available data, however, do not yet show migration increasing elsewhere along the border.